@article{
    ttj:otfj,
    author = {Jussila, Toni and Heljanko, Keijo and Niemel{\"a}, Ilkka},
    publisher = "Springer-Verlag",
    title = "{BMC} via On-the-Fly Determinization",
    url = "http://users.ics.tkk.fi/kepa/publications/",
    journal = "{STTT} - {I}nternational Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer",
    corerank = "B",
    number = "2",
    abstract = "This paper develops novel bounded model checking (BMC) techniques for asynchronous parallel systems. The aim is to increase the efficiency of BMC by exploiting the inherent concurrency in such systems. This added efficiency is gained by covering more reachable states within a given bound using two techniques. Firstly, a non-standard execution model, step executions, where multiple actions can take place simultaneously is applied. Secondly, the number of executions the system can have is reduced by modeling the execution of the system components as if they were determinized. This determinization technique also enables the removal of the internal transitions of the components. Step executions can be further restricted to a subclass called process executions without losing any reachable states. \par The paper presents a translation scheme for bounded model checking of reachability properties. The translation is from an asynchronous system where the components are modeled as labeled transition systems (LTSs) to a propositional formula. The models of the formula correspond to the step executions of the original system where each component is replaced with its determinized counterpart. The formula for step executions can be easily extended in such a way that its models correspond to the process executions of the system. The translation scheme has been implemented and some experimental comparisons performed. The results show that the bound needed to detect a violation of a reachability property is for step and process executions in most cases lower than in interleaving executions and that the running time of the model checker using process executions is smaller than using steps. Moreover, the performance compares favorably to a state-of-the-art interleaving BMC implementation in the NuSMV system.",
    volume = "7",
    juforank = "1",
    flags = "copy SA-53695",
    year = "2005",
    keywords = "verification, bounded model checking, labeled transition system",
    pages = "89--101"
}