A Gaifman-Shapiro-style architecture of program modules is introduced in the case of normal logic programs under stable model semantics. The composition of program modules is suitably limited by module conditions which ensure the compatibility of the module system with stable models. The resulting module theorem properly strengthens Lifschitz and Turner's splitting set theorem for normal logic programs. Consequently, the respective notion of equivalence between modules, i.e. modular equivalence, proves to be a congruence relation. Moreover, it is analyzed (i) how the translation-based verification technique from Janhunen and Oikarinen is accommodated to the case of modular equivalence and (ii) how the verification of weak/visible equivalence can be reorganized as a sequence of module-level tests and optimized on the basis of modular equivalence.

@inproceedings{
    OJ06:asp_eoikarin,
    editor = {Dix, J\"uergen and Hunter, Anthony},
    author = "Oikarinen, Emilia and Janhunen, Tomi",
    publisher = "University of Clausthal, Department of Informatics, Technical Report, IfI-06-04",
    title = "Modular Equivalence for Normal Logic Programs",
    url = "http://cig.in.tu-clausthal.de/NMR06",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning",
    year = "2006",
    month = "May",
    flags = "public, ACPT",
    pages = "10--18",
    address = "Lake District, UK",
    abstract = "A Gaifman-Shapiro-style architecture of program modules is introduced in the case of normal logic programs under stable model semantics. The composition of program modules is suitably limited by module conditions which ensure the compatibility of the module system with stable models. The resulting module theorem properly strengthens Lifschitz and Turner's splitting set theorem for normal logic programs. Consequently, the respective notion of equivalence between modules, i.e. modular equivalence, proves to be a congruence relation. Moreover, it is analyzed (i) how the translation-based verification technique from Janhunen and Oikarinen is accommodated to the case of modular equivalence and (ii) how the verification of weak/visible equivalence can be reorganized as a sequence of module-level tests and optimized on the basis of modular equivalence."
}

AUTHORS:

ABSTRACT:

URL:
http://cig.in.tu-clausthal.de/NMR06

AUTHORS:

ABSTRACT:

URL: http://cig.in.tu-clausthal.de/NMR06

URL:
http://cig.in.tu-clausthal.de/NMR06